Believe it or not, Brendan Fraser's Mummy franchise isn't dead. Sure, the spin-off Scorpion King was a bomb, but apparently, The Mummy lives on. TMZ says a third movie is on the way, with shooting to begin next year.
According to several sources Fraser has already been signed to reprise his leading role in the film. What's surprising is that apparently Rachel Weisz is clamoring to be involved again.
Since The Mummy Returns she's immersed herself in a wide variety of more high-brow projects, and found success doing it. She earned critical acclaim for The Constant Gardener and she'll probably earn more for The Fountain out later this year. Why would she want to go back to battling CGI monsters? Who knows, maybe she needs a bigger paycheck. Whatever the reason, Rachel says she'd "definitely like to be in it".
If she wants it, odds are she'll get it. Our friend Clint over at Moviehole says her character is already written in to the script. Universal would be foolish not to take her back.
There will however, be changes for the next Mummy movie. Specifically in its title. Universal is determined to stay away from calling it a sequel or using a title with a number in it. Seems Hollywood has talked itself into believing that if they don't call their sequels sequels, then audiences will be inclined to believe they're producing a more original product than they actually are. Word is that screenwriters Alfred Gough and Miles Millar have been taked with "reimagining" the thing for a new generation as opposed to say… those of us who watched it five years ago. When did the generational window get so small? Has Hollwyood narrowed their focus all the way down to 13-15 year olds now? And if they're really reimagining it, why aren't they using an entirely new cast? Sounds to me like a pretty thin façade. The reimagining is quickly becoming worse than the prequel. Let's just be honest about it folks. You're making a sequel. Own up to it.
Comment on “Rachel Weisz Wants To Return To The Mummy”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
You must be living under a rock if you think she will be critically acclaimed for The Fountain. The movie got booed and every review had her doing nothing in the movie except look good, she better sign up for Mummy 4 and 5 pronto!
Yes, they are always unreliable when they happen to crap on movies you like, don't they? if it were another movie you were not looking forward to, your website would be blaring the headlines of how much boo it got. Funnily enough, Fountain isn't doing much at Toronto, either, it went and nobody noticed it at Deauville. Yep, the critics are very unreliable, lol.
What is the deal with this re-imagining thing? I thought the whole Chinese emperor thing sounded cool.
How can they expect the audience the believe the idea "everything in that first one is BS, here is what really happened"
Then again, how much do we really know? This could just be an idea, ie. if they cannot get any more of the original cast.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
September 12th, 2006 at 18:15
You must be living under a rock if you think she will be critically acclaimed for The Fountain. The movie got booed and every review had her doing nothing in the movie except look good, she better sign up for Mummy 4 and 5 pronto!