Too lazy to read all
the wonderful news our insightful crew scours the globe to bring you every
day? Too outmoded to have an MP3 player for the podcast? Shame on you all!
However, being the generous lot we are, welcome to news:blended, your
weekly guide to the most interesting stories reported on Cinema Blend over the
last seven days.
Hey there! How are you? I feel unimportant. My family and I have yet to
receive the personal fury of Don Murphy for being critical of
Transformers. I'm not worried, it's a matter of time. Anyway, enough of
that, here's what's been happening in the world of Cinema Blend this week:

Remaking Couldn't Go Without A Hitch
Accepting that remakes (of both the nasty rehash or buying a cheap
third-party script and sticking a known name on it varieties) are here to stay
is hard enough. Accepting that some of the world's greatest directors' projects
are targetted for greasy-pawed remakes by MTV directors makes the job 1000 times
harder. Fair enough it is one of Hitchcock's early silent movies, we reported on
Monday,
which is in the firing line, but it all begs the question where does it stop?
Expect a hard-edged political thriller named Citizen Kane to be released
before 2010.
Elizabeth II: Annus Terriblus
There's an urban myth that they had to rename The Madness of George III to
The Madness of King George to avoid foreign audiences thinking it was a sequel.
So on Monday
when we revealed Helen Mirren would play Queen Elizabeth II in a movie hardly a
year after starring as Queen Elizabeth I in a TV mini-series, it's
understandable that Stephen Frears would opt simply for the title, The Queen,
for his movie. Helen Mirren is one of the greatest actresses around and ranks up
their with Judi Dench as those women sticking the bird to under-30s obssessed
Hollywood. The movie itself, following The Queen's life around the time of
Diana's death sounds like the worst kind of sunday afternoon melodrama, but you
can gurantee the delivery will be top notch if nothing else.
Richard Kelly's Career Goes South(land)
It's fair to say that when a studio demands you cut an hour from your movie
and you're not Peter Jackson, Steven Spielberg or George Lucas, you gotta
realise something's up. Especially when it comes on the heels of your original
three hour cut getting absolutely savaged by the usually lenient Cannes critics.
Well that's what's happened to Donnie Darko director Richard Kelly, on Tuesday
he claimed that the studio has demanded cuts to Southland Tales or the
movie will never see the light of day, then changed his mind and decided the
cuts were great and all is rosy a few days later of course, probably when the
distributors threatened to revoke his paycheck. Could it be that Kelly, the
supposed next-big-thing, is actually a one-hit-wonder? Just because your first
movie is an eventual worldwide cult hit doesn't mean you should get free reign
on your next project, all good directors had to make their bones in TV or
crappy DTV before they hit the big time. Kelly's already shown that being
brought over-night success impairs his judgement with his totally unnecessary
"Director's Cut" of the excellent-as-it-was Donnie Darko. Add to that the
critical thrashing of Domino, which he wrote, and it makes me
wonder if just maybe he's another M Night in the making; a man who's self-belief
far outweighs his actual ability or longevity.
Another 9/11 Movie? Call 911!
There's one thing the next year could do without is another 9/11 movie.
Between the emotionally draining United 93 and the just plain draining World
Trade Center, haven't we covered it? No, not when there's other studios and
other people all wanting a slice of the (so far rather poor) box office
pie. We discovered on Wednesday, one
of the survivors wants his story told, the difference being that this guy's a
conspiracy theorist who thinks the US
government crashed those planes to justify the war in the middle east. So
you've got that idea, who ya gonna call? Charlie Sheen of course! Sheen's been
outspoken in his doubts over 9/11 and so would likely be all over this like a
rash. After all, when your movie career's all but dead anyway, what's the risk
in tackling such a biased no-shock-value story?
Eragon Trailer Was Here. Now Gone.
A couple of weeks ago the poster for new movie Eragon was leaked and
it reeked of a poor man's Dungeons & Dragons (Is that possible?) while also
stylistically looking like a cheap rip-off of the Harry Potter and the Goblet
of Fire posters. Then on Wednesday
we revealed the real trailer for the movie, not the cheap fan-made ones plaguing
YouTube now that any old schoolkid can download Adobe Premier from Bit Torrent
and which many other sites fell for. The book was written by a 15 year old and
to be honest from the trailer we showed it looks and sounds like a story written
by a 15 year old who had a creative writing project straight after a Star Wars
and Dragonheart DVD marathon. Maybe teenage boys will get a kick out of this
one, but to me it just looks tired and derivative. Sadly the evil henchmen of
Fox have pulled all genuine copies of the trailer, so you'll just have to take
my word for it for now.
Peter Jackson is too Dam busy
Peter Jackson is swiftly turning in to the new James Cameron. He's made his
few big movies and despite having that one other movie he wants to make, has
decided to take up the Producer chair for a while and let others do the hard
work. First it was Halo, now on Thursday, Peter
announced he's going back to remakes of black and white classics for a new
version of the iconic british WWII movie Dambusters. But he'll not be making it,
just producing. One of his King Kong cohorts, Christian Rivers will be
directing. In usual Jackson style they're not doing anything by halves, planning
to employ twelve full scale replica Lancaster bombers. My grandad used to fly
theose big bastards during the war, so this combined with the project under the
safe reigns of PJ means a rare remake that gets a green light from
me.
Hop on The Hobbit
Speaking of Peter Jackson, remember that legal problem with Sony that stopped
New Line greenlighting The Hobbit hot on the heels of LOTR's success? Well an
unconfirmed rumor from inside the studio on Friday suggested that they are in
fact going ahead with the project and that July 2007 could be significant. Peter
Jackson has always been pretty insistant that he'd like to return for the job,
but given his producer's schedule and his determination to make Lovely
Bones, his plate's full for at least another two years and change. Is a
Tolkien movie without Jackson at the helm such a great idea? Could anyone else capture the magic he brought?
Knight Rider Not Pirated
David Hasselhoff, when not dodging possessed chandeliers of murderous intent,
or entertaining the German pop music market, still lives in a little
Hollywood fantasy world. He's in good company. It's the same fantasy world as
George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Harrison Ford. It's the one where you have
this idea for a movie even though there's almost no chance of it ever being made, but yet
you insist on annoying fans by just refusing to flat out admit defeat and
letting the thing go. On Friday,
Orlando Bloom said that he turned down an offer from The Hoff to play his son in
the Knight Rider movie. And while I think Bloom's acting ability is vastly
over-rated, it's such a dead fish project that I don't blame him from not
wanting anything to do with it while there's absolutely no credibility in the
idea. Hoff, get a good script, get a decent director, get another bout of freaky
cosmetic surgery, and stop stalking actors for a project that's never going to
get made. I love Knight Rider but even I'm getting bored.
Well, that's your lot for this week. Remember to visit our News section daily
for the smartest and wittiest take on the latest happenings in Hollywood. And
remember, through our comments sections you can leave your own thoughts on each
and every story and review, even this one. Enjoy putting your opinion forward
even more? Why not join the forum. We want to hear from you. See you in seven
days.
Note: This website is not intended for use by minors. The views expressed in this comments section are not necessarily our own. Comments that we deem to be poorly worded, off topic, or threatening will not be published. For free, uncensored discussion visit our forum.
Leave a Reply