For his second English-language film, Fernando Meirelles, one of the most visually expressive filmmakers working today, has chosen to make a film about people who have gone blind. It would be a sick joke if Meirelles didn't take it so seriously, translating his visual flair into a story that allows the audience a sight that none of the characters, save one, can have. Blindness, an adaptation of Jose Saramago's allegorical novel, is a brutal slog in some parts, but it also powerfully lifts the veil on human decency, revealing the worms, dirt and brutality that lurk underneath.
The movie starts as some of the best end-of-the-world stories do, with unrelated residents of an unnamed city suddenly, inexplicably going blind. Chief among them is The Doctor (Mark Ruffalo), who treats the first man struck with the blindness (Yusuke Iseya) and goes blind himself the next day. Though the Doctor's Wife (Julianne Moore) is not blind herself, she goes with her husband to a quarantine facility, where they are joined by increasingly more victims of what's being called "The White Sickness." We see various news reports and government summits trying to solve the crisis, but soon we are trapped within the crumbling mental facility that grows ever more crowded with the blind.
The only sighted person in the building, the Doctor's Wife is the only one to bear witness of the fetid, miserable cell, and she and her husband do their best to maintain order and a sense of democracy. But as food shipments grow scarcer, and the outside world seemingly abandons them, a man who dubs himself the King of Ward Three (Gael Garcia Bernal) stages a coup, hoarding food and demanding bribes from the other wards. At first it's jewelry, but soon women from each ward are being recruited as collateral.
Filming so much of his movie inside cramped, disgusting quarters, Meirelles makes the most of his camera, washing out the film's colors to emulate the "white" blindness, using quick cuts and all kinds of crazy camera angles both to convey the sense of growing madness in the hospital and emphasize the audience's gift of sight. There's an issue of voyeurism here, in what the audience can see that the characters cannot, but Meirelles unfortunately ignores it for the large part. Had he indicted the audience as voyeur, as Hitchcock and so many horror directors have done, he could have truly distinguished his film from the novel; instead the literary roots stick to the film a little too closely, particularly in the conceit of giving no names to its characters.
Bear with me while I get a little theoretical here. Allegories work in novels, and have for centuries, because characters that exist only in your mind can stand for anything-- pigs can stand for Russian communists, the Salem Witch Trials can stand for McCarthyism, etc. But film is exceedingly literal, with each character represented by a single actor, so that the Doctor's Wife may be intended as a larger symbol of humanity, but is always also Julianne Moore. In that way the scale of Blindness becomes diminished, a story about one nightmare in one quarantine ward, rather than the sweeping metaphor the novel likely is.
The stellar performances (particularly from Moore, Ruffalo and Bernal), impeccable production design and stirring, though occasionally flashy, cinematography make Blindness worth the suffering it inflicts on its audiences. It doesn't quite reach the allegorical, accusatory heights it seems to aim for, but it offers a chance for stark reflection, and invites the audience to make the leap from the fictional blindness to whatever real-life disaster is happening today. A sharp view of humanity with a glimmer of hope, Blindness is a movie for our times-- flawed, brutal, with key moments of brilliance.
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
worst movie I ever saw. I watched just 3/4 of movie, I couldn't bare. It is pointless, something that even if in real world could happen that, it is imposible that the goverment of any country treat the people like that. No nurses or doctors in that hospice, the blinds people are just trow in that place and is nobody there to show them the bathroom. so stupid......:). and is that blind guy how wants to lead and he have a gun...omg a blind guy with a gun. and he demands money or electronics like tv's in trade for food. it is not realistic....it is stupid.
This movie was BULLSHIT!!! I can't believe I wasted hard earned money on this film. I don't get it. The movie did not explain the cause of the blindness or why she was the only one that could see. Also, if there was more that could see and why dude was cured at the end. If it wasn't for the titties I saw in da movie, I would've left in da first hour. But, since I spent my money on this shitty ass movie, I stayed to see if there would be a silver lining. Which had no point and no reason why the blindness occured in the first place. I give this film two thumbs and two big toes way the fuck down. Please give me my money back. Whomever reads this, please,I beg of you. Don't make the same mistake I've made. Shit, I damn near wished I went blind after seeing that BULLSHIT!!!
I agree...my boyfriend and I went and seen this...HORRIBLE movie!!! Yes, the actors did a good job, but there seemed to be absolutely no point to the movie.
BLINDNESS IS ABSOLUTLY THE WORST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN!!! I have seen stupid, pointless movies before, but this crap was by far the biggest waste of $8 and 2 Hrs ever!!! absolutly a huge waste of time and money!!! And it's not that I did not understand it or something like that, it is just the ABSOLUTE WORST MOVIE IN EXISTANCE!!! DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY AND TIME!!! BEWARE OF BLINDNESS BECAUSE YOU WILL WANT TO GO BLIND!!! If you want to know what it is about, here is the plot in lamens terms, a guy goes blind mysteriously, other people go blind mysteriously, the government of some unknown country sends all the blind folks to an old abandoned asylum alone and lock them in alone, the people then startwalking around naked and pissing everywhere, then all the women allow themselves to be raped for food until one guy kills one of the women, then the one woman who can see kills a guy, then they all start killing one another until the building goes up in flames, when they escape and then find everyones blind, then they can all of a sudden see again... And again beware do not waste your time or money on this bullshit!!!
I cannot say i adored the movie...but i can tell that none of the people who commented here know what it was really about. the movie was not meant to depict a possible real blindness. investigate further on the author and the book on which the movie was based before passing judgement on something that none of you understood.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
October 5th, 2008 at 13:57
worst movie I ever saw. I watched just 3/4 of movie, I couldn't bare. It is pointless, something that even if in real world could happen that, it is imposible that the goverment of any country treat the people like that. No nurses or doctors in that hospice, the blinds people are just trow in that place and is nobody there to show them the bathroom. so stupid......:). and is that blind guy how wants to lead and he have a gun...omg a blind guy with a gun. and he demands money or electronics like tv's in trade for food. it is not realistic....it is stupid.