George Lucas has had an idea for a fourth Indiana Jones movie for more than a decade now, but Spielberg and Ford wanted nothing to do with it. Eventually he wore them down and the result is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. It’s easy to see why Spielberg and Ford were hesitant to make it. The direction of this fourth adventure is a marked departure from the other films. Then of course there’s the fact that Harrison Ford is older, a lot older, and now so is Indiana Jones. Steven Spielberg and George Lucas had only two choices: Age the character along with their leading actor, or simply replace him. Wait, scratch that. There was a third option: leave well enough alone. Nobody said there had to be a fourth Indiana Jones movie, and though the one they’ve made works well enough, we might have been better off if Spielberg and Ford had stuck to their guns, leaving Indiana Jones to linger in our memory as the untarnished icon he always was. Indiana Jones isn’t supposed to be mortal, and while he may never actually die on screen his aching, creaking body seems headed there, albeit from natural causes.
Indiana’s survival is now the stuff of utter fantasy. Sure the tight spots he made it out of in previous movies stretched the bounds of believability, but now those bounds have been broken, snapped, and tossed straight out the window. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull does that in the first fifteen minutes, when Indy survives something so ludicrous that it’s right out of a bad, 1950s, sci-fi serial; which of course is what Lucas and Spielberg are using as inspiration. Later it gets even weirder as a key character, I kid you not, swings through the trees on vines and enlists the aid of a tribe of sympathetic monkeys.
The previous Indy movies were patterned after adventure products of the 30s, the time period in which the other three films were set. This one is set in the 50s, with Indiana Jones now an old man, and having in the time we’ve been away from him survived numerous trials and tribulations in WWII. That’s right, while we weren’t looking Indiana Jones was off storming Normandy. Apparently when the camera’s not on him Indiana Jones lives a secret life as Captain America. In the process, the always somewhat gruff doctor Jones has started wearing baggy old man pants and gotten downright surly. I mention his costume because it stands out. The hat’s the same, so is the whip, but what’s up with his pants? I think my grandpa has that same pair, he bought them at Goodwill for 99 cents. Doesn’t Harrison look old enough without dressing him in sensible, wrinkle-free slacks? Indiana Jones is supposed to look dashing and grungy, not frumpy.
He may be more grumpy and he may not be much of a dresser, but the glimmer hasn’t entirely gone out of Harrison’s eyes. We’re reacquainted with Indy in the midst of intrigue involving Russians. It’s the 50s, the Nazis have been defeated, and that means Indy must now fight communism. The Reds are led by an army officer named Irina Spalko, played by Cate Blanchett. From the outset she’s no match for Indiana Jones, and Cate’s take on the character seems to involve a lot of gaping and staring. Spalko is after an American secret and she drags Indy out to a certain spot in the Nevada desert, where our adventure begins, offset by comedic gophers which seem to have wandered over from the set of Caddyshack. From Nevada it’s off to South America, where the gophers are replaced by monkeys, and jungle clue chasing with Indiana and his friends can begin in earnest.
Aside from the dead end that is Cate Blanchett’s villain, it’s in Harrison’s interaction with the film’s supporting cast that Kingdom of the Crystal Skull works best. Shia LaBeouf joins the Indiana Jones universe as Mutt Williams, Indy’s sidekick dujour for this adventure. They have genuine chemistry together, and Jones works as a crotchety mentor figure for LaBeouf’s smart but rebellious 50s biker-punk character. Ford also still has chemistry with Karen Allen, first seen way back in Raiders of the Lost Ark, and returning here as an older, more mature Marion Ravenwood. It’s a different kind of rapport than the one they had in Raiders, a relationship tempered by time, age, and experience. It works, even though much of the time Allen is left with very little to do but observe.
But you’re here for adventure and there’s plenty of that. The movie soars in several character driven action sequences, and sags in others. Indiana has another one of those genius “shoot the sword guy” moments which alone makes Kingdom of the Crystal Skull worth the price of admission. Most of the effects are good, and it’s all well staged. Unfortunately, sometimes perhaps a little too well staged. This Indiana Jones feels less organic than any of the other movies. It feels more choreographed. Of course it’s all choreographed, but some of the action sequences in this one seem more like dance numbers than truly dangerous, rock-em-sock em Indiana Jones action. Even though old age should mean he’s more fragile, I never truly felt like Indiana was in trouble, and I’m not sure he ever did either. Maybe it’s because some of it goes so far over the top that it crosses that believability line I mentioned earlier. Or, and I hate to keep harping on this, maybe it’s Harrison’s age. There’s no way a guy this grey could pull any of this off, and so when he does, it’s harder than ever to buy into any of it.
Could his age also be to blame for the film's finale, where Indy spends most of his time standing back while everyone else does the hard work? The second part of the movie feels a lot like National Treasure, with Indy as a Nic Cage puzzle-solving cypher. Meanwhile, the puzzles aren't particularly engaging and if you haven't figured them out thirty minutes into the film, then you really should get out of the house more. That's not to say it's all puzzles, Indy does plenty of whip cracking and commie punching. Better still, Harrison manages to pull all of that off wonderfully. You'll geek out and cheer with every punch. The script simply seems to get lost towards the end, abandoning subplots and leaving Indiana standing around watching, as if even screenwriter David Koepp wasn't sure what the hell Lucas was thinking with this oddball MacGuffin.
I went into Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ready to dispense with the silly notion that Harrison Ford was too old to play Indiana, and walked out uncomfortable with the certainty that now the best way to describe Dr. Jones is not as dashing or daring, but as feisty. Anybody who’s any kind of an Indiana Jones fan (and who isn’t?) will no doubt find fun in this final chance to see Harrison back in the hat, but it’s hard not to wonder if we might not have been happier in the long run with Indiana Jones as a mythical figure somewhere off in the distance, never aging, never changing, and living solely for the rush of adrenaline that comes with adventure. The idea of a fourth Indiana Jones movie is better than the reality, and a few years from now I guarantee fans will find themselves more likely to re-watch Temple of Doom than to revisit this entertaining, yet past its prime Indy entry.
Image Gallery for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Comment on “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull”
Note: This website is not meant for use by minors. The views expressed in the comments section below are not our own. This section is intended for discussion of the topic in the post above. Disagreement is encouraged, however comments which attack, insult, or threaten the author in a personal manner won't be published. Similarly, comments that we deem to be poorly worded, or wildly off topic will also not be approved and may be mocked. For free, uncensored, unfettered, and possibly dangerous discussion visit our forum.
This movie is tragic. I agree with this review, it should of ended on the highnote of indiana riding off into the sun in the last crusade. This paints a sour picture of a hero!
This movie is for Fans, that's it. Stupid critics, always complaining. People are gonna enjoy this movie and they're gonna ask for more. As Roger Ebert Said: If you eat four pounds of sausage, how do you choose which pound tasted the best? Well, the first one, of course, and then there's a steady drop-off of interest. That's why no Indy adventure can match "Raiders of the Lost Ark" (1981). But if "Crystal Skull" (or "Temple of Doom" from 1984 or "Last Crusade" from, 1989) had come first in the series, who knows how much fresher it might have seemed? Go see the movie, have fun and ignore Josh Tyler, idiot.
Well you obviously took your own advice Marc and ignored me... because apparently you didn't even read my review before you ripped it.
I pretty clearly said fans will enjoy it, and I said I had fun with it myself.
By the way, your premise is flawed and foolish, especially in my case since I think Last Crusade is the best of the previous three Indy movies. That "steady drop off of interest" formula you have there really doesn't work. Most people think Empire Strikes Back for instance, is the best Star Wars. The third Harry Potter movie is often regarded as the best of those films. Spider-Man 2 is clearly the best Spider-Man movie. Sorry man, doesn't hold water.
Meanwhile, have you actually seen this movie? Because if you have, I'd love to hear what you thought of it. If you haven't, then perhaps you should wait to decide whether or not you agree with me until you've actually seen it.
Raiders was far and away the best movie. Temple just went nowhere for no real reason, and Crusade was simple pandering - which is what I figure this new movie is. I'll see it and decide for myself, but I don't have high hopes that it will in any way compare to the original. It's almost impossible to live up to the magic and wonder that comes from a first experience, which Lucas has proven time and again, and I feel there was no point to this movie beyond the Search for More Money. I would like to be convinced otherwise, and who knows - maybe I will be. But I'm not holding my breath.
Odd how some consider Indie Immortal yet I never have. I was always hoping to see Indie go through age slowly, changing his methods and getting rid of the notion that he must do all the work and take all the risks. Archeology depicted as an adventurous occupation always seemed funny to me in the films but then again they are action films. The first film at least did have the classroom component and depicted the time required for excavations and failed attempts by all involved (Indie and the Nazi's). I wont see the film till tomorrow night but I hope it closes the series properly. We will have a complete depiction of the life of Indiana Jones with this conclusion (Young Indiana Jones through retired Indiana Jones)and hopefully pass the torch to the next generation of adventurous archeologist's.
Oh and it bothers me some when it is mentioned that Harrison Ford is too old for the part. Harrison Ford is probably far more active in outdoor activities than many of the film reviewers. I often catch an article on him supporting some wildlife conservation fund or activity. He pilots planes (or is it helicopters) and often supports search and rescue operations near his home.
Seriously, what is it with "Indy's Harry Happy Pants" get-up? Mid 1990's
was and should have been the cut off point for Part 4. Like the reviewer said Indy is mortal not Immortal. They should have taken a leaf out of Stallone's "Rocky Balboa"
The only issue I have with your review is the idea that as a fan we don't want to see Indy age. If you are a fan it is to late for that.
Indy drank from the holy grail. The grail could not leave its place but the damage (un-damage?) was done. Indy will live for a very very long time and grow to a rather old age. This is evidenced by the Young Indiana Jones series.
First episode of the young Indy series we see a very old and rather feisty Indiana in a museum talking a young boy. He has a cane and is apparently missing an eye. We see him again in the episode relating to a painting.
If you take these concepts into account I think that you can eliminate the complaint about his age at least. As for the rest... I will see it when I see it. I am glad you seemed to enjoy the movie over all.
I agree with the reviewer. I had plenty of good memories as a kid growing up watching the series and now seeing Indy as an old man well just takes the magic out of the series and makes you feel that much older. If they were going to make a fourth one they should have did it 15 years ago. Indy is supposed to be an ageless character like James Bond, the Lone Ranger, Conan, Superman, Batman, etc, an icon in children's mind not some aging actor.
it would seem that the recipe of a good Indiana Jones film would be 1 part Nazis and 1 part Biblical Artefact... the Soviet army does a pretty good job of replacing the Nazis, but the other ingredient...
I am a true Indiana Jones fan and admittedly, I entered the theater to see "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" with high expectations. As soon as the movie started and the song "Shake, Rattle, and Roll" began blasting, I realized that this was not going to be like the original Indy flicks. I was ready for that classical Indy prelude music - you know, John Williams slow and intense theme that makes you giddy.
At that point, I decided not to let my subjectivity and frank obsession with Indiana and the original films get in my way - because obviously this cannot be an original film and that is not what they are aiming for. If you go to see this movie, enjoy it for the sake of the movie - not for what they leave out or include.
My only gripe is near the end of the movie, when Indy calls Mutt "Junior." I grinned in my seat, waiting for Mutt's snarky rebuttal: "DONT call me JUNIOR!" But alas, the script-writer ignored one of the best lines from the original movies. However, the rest of the film is entertaining enough to compensate.
And as for that remark on Indiana standing back near the conclusion and letting other characters do the work; it is because Indiana, in his older age, has developed wisdom and the ability to listen to others.
This is definitely appropriate because if he were as gung-ho as his younger character, it would be pathetic to watch.
I just saw Indy 4, and had high hopes for it, having grown up to the Indy Films. Bottomline, for an Indiana Jones movie, it wasnt that good. Dont get me wrong, it was a pretty good movie, but it didnt FEEL like an Indiana Jones movie at all. Didnt have the character, and certainly didnt have the depth and sense of adventure the first 3 had. Its like everything was forced. PLUS, other than that scene with Mutt and Indy on the bike after the bad guys hit the statue with the car, I thought Shia's character was annoying as hell, and contributed NOTHING to the movie...I just wish they'd just continue with the Indy chronicles on tv....
movie was freakin sweet, was a teenager when I saw the others in the theaters and absolutley loved them then, took my son and daughter who are about the same age when I saw the first movies, they loved this movie as much as I did when I was younger it made me very happy this movie was made, get a life critic, YOU SUCK.
I also think in two months this movie willl blow blue ray owners away at home
As soon as the movie started and the song "Shake, Rattle, and Roll" began blasting, I realized that this was not going to be like the original Indy flicks. I was ready for that classical Indy prelude music - you know, John Williams slow and intense theme that makes you giddy.
-----------------------
Ah yes the classic slow and intense John Williams Indy prelude music of Kate Capshaw singing "Anything Goes." in mandarin chinese. I remember it well.
This film is a piece of crap. It has the feel of a boring knock-off (like the ones spawned after the first couple of Indy films in the 80s). I'm sure hardcore Indy fans will be frothing at the mouth, but I feel ripped off. I know that the Indiana Jones movies are supposed to be filled with fantastic over-the-top adventure, but watching Shia LaBeouf swinging from vines a-la Tarzan with a group of monkeys was just plain stupid. It seemed that the character of Mut (Shia) had no place in the movie other than to draw in the younger generation with a familiar face. Harrison Ford (yes, he still in decent shape) is just too old to be believable as the adventurous Indy, and the "plot twists" were something that would fascinate a 3rd grader. Again, if you're a HARDCORE Indiana Jones fan you will be... amused. But that has more to do with nostalgia, than with good entertainment. I would give it two stars out of five. Wait for the DVD or catch a matinee. Not worth $10.
"I kid you not, swings through the trees on vines and enlists the aid of a tribe of sympathetic monkeys. "
MINOR SPOILER
Well swinging on a vine is not that hard if even a monkey can do it. Just how did Mutt enlist the aid of the monkeys? Does he speak monkey? No. They followed him due to their natural curiosity and collided with the Russians.
I had to laugh at several scenes because they were so outrageous. Don't expect reality in this latest/last Indy adventure with Ford. The torch has been handed to "his" kid. Expect multiple sequels in the years ahead. Just don't expect them to be worth seeing. Bottom line: enjoy this last Ford/Indy movie without worrying about the ridiculous parts. HAVE FUN. There's not many you can do that with these days of remakes of old tv series, comedies without comedy, celebrity bios, more remakes of remakes, etc. Not even mentioning ticket and concession prices.
This site is operated by Cinema Blend LLC. For advertising inquiries, contact Gorilla Nation. CinemaBlend.com is a private, independently owned website which is intended only as entertainment. The views expressed on this website may or may not reflect those of its owner. Don't take us too seriously.
May 19th, 2008 at 07:53
This movie is tragic. I agree with this review, it should of ended on the highnote of indiana riding off into the sun in the last crusade. This paints a sour picture of a hero!